Ivan H. Scheier

21 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

Ivan H. Scheier
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Psychology 17
  • Applied Psychology 58
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
  • Clinical Psychology 110
  • Social Psychology 93
Replace Harold J. Fine with:
Harold J. Fine United States
Victor J. Ganzer United States
Michael D. Spiegler United States
Terry C. Wade United States
Robert F. Suczek United States
Kevin E. Keller United States
Leo Shatin United States
Fritz Perls
Arthur Burton United States
John Kolligian United States
Ivan H. Scheier relative to Harold J. Fine United States Harold J. Fine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Harold J. Fine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ivan H. Scheier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivan H. Scheier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivan H. Scheier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivan H. Scheier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivan H. Scheier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivan H. Scheier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivan H. Scheier. The network helps show where Ivan H. Scheier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Ivan H. Scheier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ivan H. Scheier Line = papers co-authored together Ivan H. Scheier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1958106
2
Handbook for the IPAT anxiety scale questionnaire : self analysis form
196325
3 196022
4 195221
5 195918
6 195815
7 196115
8 195814
9 195814
10 195913
11 195411
12
Exploring volunteer space : the recruiting of a nation
19806
13 19594
14
Handbook for the objective-analytic (O-A) anxiety battery
19604
15 19594
16 19543
17 19623
18 19603
19
Building staff/volunteer relations
19933
20 19583

About Ivan H. Scheier

Ivan H. Scheier is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (1 paper), Education and Professional Development (1 paper) and Problem Solving Skills Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (17 citations), Applied Psychology (58 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations), Clinical Psychology (110 citations) and Social Psychology (93 citations). Ivan H. Scheier has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Raymond B. Cattell, George A. Ferguson, Dalbir Bindra, Robert R. Knapp, George J. Wischner and John L. Horn. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, The Journal of General Psychology, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, The Journal of Educational Research and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact