Ito Peng

1.3k citations
42 papers · 859 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ito Peng

38 papers receiving 732 citations

Peers

Ito Peng
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Public Administration 91
  • Political Science and International Relations 542
  • Finance 136
  • Sociology and Political Science 530
  • Gender Studies 109
Replace Pieter Vanhuysse with:
Pieter Vanhuysse Israel
Steven Saxonberg Czechia
Juliana Martínez Franzoni Costa Rica
Kwong‐leung Tang Canada
Lia van Doorn Netherlands
Margarita León Spain
Aleksandra Ålund Sweden
Åke Bergmark Sweden
Peo Hansen Sweden
Martin Bak Jørgensen Denmark
Ito Peng relative to Pieter Vanhuysse Israel Pieter Vanhuysse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Pieter Vanhuysse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ito Peng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ito Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ito Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ito Peng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ito Peng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ito Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ito Peng. The network helps show where Ito Peng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ito Peng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ito Peng Line = papers co-authored together Ito Peng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008102
2
The East Asian Welfare States: Peripatetic Learning, Adaptive Changes, and Nation Building
199684
3 200283
4 201264
5 200459
6 201542
7 201140
8 200036
9 201034
10 201229
11 201023
12 201422
13 201620
14 201219
15 201819
16 201118
17 200918
18 201716
19 201315
20 200515

About Ito Peng

Ito Peng is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Finance, Public Administration and Gender Studies, having authored 42 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (22 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (14 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (6 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (6 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (5 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (91 citations), Political Science and International Relations (542 citations), Finance (136 citations), Sociology and Political Science (530 citations) and Gender Studies (109 citations). Ito Peng has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Wong, Roger Goodman, Sonya A. Michel, Neda Maghbouleh, Melissa A. Milkie, Chau‐kiu Cheung, Raymond K. H. Chan, Linda Burhansstipanov, Diana L. Gustafson and Judy Gould. Their work appears in journals such as Social Policy and Administration, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society, International Journal of Social Welfare and Development and Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact