I‐Te Wang

643 citations
17 papers · 435 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

I‐Te Wang

16 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

I‐Te Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 198
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 114
  • Reproductive Medicine 56
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 104
  • Physiology 130
Replace Yaşam Kemal Akpak with:
Yaşam Kemal Akpak Türkiye
Michela Quaranta Italy
Dmitry Rakita United States
Olivia Williams United Kingdom
Jing Tang China
Shimpei Watanabe Japan
Massimiliano Pellicano Italy
Mehmet Şükrü Budak Türkiye
Christopher Welch United Kingdom
Aniruddh Deshpande Australia
I‐Te Wang relative to Yaşam Kemal Akpak Türkiye Yaşam Kemal Akpak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.4×
Yaşam Kemal Akpak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I‐Te Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I‐Te Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I‐Te Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I‐Te Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I‐Te Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I‐Te Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I‐Te Wang. The network helps show where I‐Te Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I‐Te Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I‐Te Wang Line = papers co-authored together I‐Te Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2011171
2 201283
3 200667
4 201138
5 201434
6 202111
7 20219
8 20225
9 20214
10 20123
11 20133
12 20192
13 20232
14 20241
15 20211
16 20061
17 20250

About I‐Te Wang

I‐Te Wang is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and Medication Impact (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (198 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (114 citations), Reproductive Medicine (56 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (104 citations) and Physiology (130 citations). I‐Te Wang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Yi‐Hua Chen, Joseph J. Keller, Jiunn‐Horng Kang, Ching-Chun Lin, Herng‐Ching Lin, Ching‐Chun Lin, Herng‐Ching Lin, Chii‐Ruey Tzeng, Weimin Liu and Peng‐Hui Wang. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medicine, Applied Sciences, Annals of Epidemiology and Respirology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact