Iris van Oostrom

1.9k citations
50 papers · 1.5k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Iris van Oostrom

48 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Iris van Oostrom
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 107
  • Neurology 146
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 249
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 237
  • Genetics 438
Replace Emma J. Rose with:
Emma J. Rose United States
Aldo Córdova‐Palomera Spain
Julia W. Tossell United States
Jeanne E. Savage United States
Michael Rohan United States
Tricia Z. King United States
Paola Brovedani Italy
Rickard L. Sjöberg Sweden
Tamás Tényi Hungary
Cherise Rosen United States
Iris van Oostrom relative to Emma J. Rose United States Emma J. Rose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Emma J. Rose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iris van Oostrom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iris van Oostrom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris van Oostrom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris van Oostrom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iris van Oostrom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris van Oostrom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris van Oostrom. The network helps show where Iris van Oostrom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iris van Oostrom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iris van Oostrom Line = papers co-authored together Iris van Oostrom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003238
2 2013123
3 202272
4 200665
5 201750
6 201250
7 200649
8 200649
9 201848
10 201547
11 201646
12 201046
13 200743
14 201143
15 200641
16 201137
17 201236
18 200629
19 201229
20 201324

About Iris van Oostrom

Iris van Oostrom is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (11 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (9 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (107 citations), Neurology (146 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (249 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (237 citations) and Genetics (438 citations). Iris van Oostrom has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Indira Tendolkar, Aad Tibben, Janna N. Vrijsen, Arthur R. Van Gool, Philip van Eijndhoven, Barbara Franke, Anne Speckens, Hugo J. Duivenvoorden, Jan G.M. Klijn and Guillén Fernández. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Cognitive Therapy and Research, Journal of Affective Disorders, Brain stimulation and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact