IRC Bick

414 citations
26 papers · 348 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
  • Pharmacology top 10%
    • Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
    • Plant-based Medicinal Research

Papers in

    • Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 10
    • Berberine and alkaloids research 4
    • Biological and pharmacological studies of plants 2

IRC Bick

26 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

IRC Bick
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Biochemistry 110
  • Pharmacology 73
  • Horticulture 6
  • Organic Chemistry 160
  • Pharmacology 45
Replace NK Hart with:
NK Hart Australia
Dominic A. Okorie Nigeria
Mary D. Menachery United States
Arnaldo I. Da Rocha Brazil
Dewan S. Bhakuni India
Daniel Dwuma-Badu United States
Jun‐ichi Kunitomo Japan
AA Sioumis Australia
Takaaki Aratani Japan
P.C. Parthasarathy India
IRC Bick relative to NK Hart Australia NK Hart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
NK Hart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by IRC Bick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of IRC Bick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by IRC Bick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IRC Bick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by IRC Bick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by IRC Bick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by IRC Bick. The network helps show where IRC Bick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside IRC Bick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with IRC Bick Line = papers co-authored together IRC Bick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197943
2 197934
3 198932
4 197320
5 196518
6 197918
7 195617
8 196316
9 197916
10 197315
11 196514
12 196712
13 197111
14 197810
15 197810
16 19699
17 19749
18 19838
19 19788
20
A Survey of Tasmanian Plants for Alkaloids
19966

About IRC Bick

IRC Bick is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Pharmacology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (10 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (8 papers), Berberine and alkaloids research (4 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Biological and pharmacological studies of plants (2 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (110 citations), Pharmacology (73 citations), Horticulture (6 citations), Organic Chemistry (160 citations) and Pharmacology (45 citations). IRC Bick has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include AJ Blackman, DHS Horn, PS Clezy, JB Bremner, Subramanian Sotheeswaran, A. Cavé, Marı́a Luisa Nieto, Henri Moskowitz, Pierre Cabalion and Thierry Sévenet. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Chemistry and Figshare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact