Ingrid Hook

28 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Ingrid Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Toxicology 26
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 60
  • Plant Science 219
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 95
  • Pharmacology 71
Replace Beatriz King‐Díaz with:
Beatriz King‐Díaz Mexico
Ji Yang China
Chang‐Hong Huo China
Isabelle Pouny France
Shu‐Jiau Chiou Taiwan
Richard Randrianaivo United States
Young Choong Kim South Korea
Katy Díaz Chile
Baomin Feng China
Jaime Bermejo Barrera Spain
Ingrid Hook relative to Beatriz King‐Díaz Mexico Beatriz King‐Díaz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Beatriz King‐Díaz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingrid Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingrid Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingrid Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingrid Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingrid Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingrid Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingrid Hook. The network helps show where Ingrid Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingrid Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingrid Hook Line = papers co-authored together Ingrid Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201386
2 200661
3 199938
4 199336
5 200133
6 200328
7 199923
8 200220
9 199418
10 202017
11 200017
12 199712
13 198811
14 198911
15 199911
16 20109
17 19929
18 19919
19 19907
20 20185

About Ingrid Hook

Ingrid Hook is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cancer Research and Pharmacology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (9 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (5 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (4 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (3 papers), Berberine and alkaloids research (3 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (26 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (60 citations), Plant Science (219 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (95 citations) and Pharmacology (71 citations). Ingrid Hook has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Helen Sheridan, Trevor R. Hodkinson, James C. Carolan, Martin Henman, Joachim W. Kadereit, Mark W. Chase, Graham Wilson, John Walsh, Paraic James and Daniel Guénard. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Planta Medica, Journal of Natural Products, Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) and Horticulturae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact