Ingram Wright

20 papers receiving 736 citations

Peers

Ingram Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 194
  • Developmental Neuroscience 47
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 119
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 149
Replace Sarah Raz with:
Sarah Raz United States
Claire L. Isaac United Kingdom
Sarah Treit Canada
Anastasia Dimitropoulos United States
Marc D. Rudolph United States
Ann Oostra Belgium
Philippe Mazet France
Karen Evankovich United States
Sarah Shea Canada
Tatsuya Ogino Japan
Ingram Wright relative to Sarah Raz United States Sarah Raz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Sarah Raz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingram Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingram Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingram Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingram Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingram Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingram Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingram Wright. The network helps show where Ingram Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingram Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingram Wright Line = papers co-authored together Ingram Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2003168
2 2008151
3 2006141
4 202058
5 200953
6 200641
7 200831
8 201828
9 200927
10 199221
11 199720
12 20049
13 20129
14 20128
15 20222
16 20052
17 20232
18 20211
19 20251
20
Development and Validation of the Children’s Cognitive Screening Instrument (CCoSI)
20161

About Ingram Wright

Ingram Wright is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 774 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (194 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (47 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (119 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (59 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations). Ingram Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Helen Prescott, Mitch Waterman, Pauline Slade, John Davies, Elizabeth Isaacs, Faraneh Vargha‐Khadem, J. Helen Cross, Torsten Baldeweg, William Harkness and Francesca Cormack. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Archives of Disease in Childhood, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Infant Mental Health Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact