Ingeborg Forthun

2.9k citations
23 papers · 287 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ingeborg Forthun

20 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Ingeborg Forthun
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Emergency Medical Services 42
  • General Health Professions 116
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 66
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 84
  • Clinical Psychology 76
Replace Denise M. Mota with:
Denise M. Mota Brazil
Christine Genest Canada
Naime Altay Türkiye
Lori L. Trego United States
Zeinab Hemati Iran
Gülbahtiyar Demirel Türkiye
Vanessa Clarke Ireland
Chelsea McKinney United States
Roghieh Kharaghani Iran
Matthew P. Myrvik United States
Ingeborg Forthun relative to Denise M. Mota Brazil Denise M. Mota's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Denise M. Mota · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingeborg Forthun

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingeborg Forthun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingeborg Forthun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingeborg Forthun more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingeborg Forthun

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingeborg Forthun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingeborg Forthun. The network helps show where Ingeborg Forthun may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingeborg Forthun, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingeborg Forthun Line = papers co-authored together Ingeborg Forthun links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202196
2 201657
3 201832
4 202314
5 201611
6 202110
7 20229
8 20219
9 20198
10 20228
11 20247
12 20235
13 20225
14 20234
15 20204
16 20243
17 20182
18 20241
19 20241
20 20221

About Ingeborg Forthun

Ingeborg Forthun is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (42 citations), General Health Professions (116 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (66 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (84 citations) and Clinical Psychology (76 citations). Ingeborg Forthun has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mette Christophersen Tollånes, Dag Moster, Kristine Husøy Onarheim, Allen J. Wilcox, Elisabeth Schanche, Katrine Strandberg‐Larsen, Karl Ove Hufthammer, Margrethe Aase Schaufel, Ingrid Miljeteig and Inger Elise Engelund. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Ethics, PEDIATRICS, BMJ Open, Family Practice and Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact