Inge Schuster

32 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Inge Schuster
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 688
  • Pharmacology 88
  • Nephrology 55
  • Molecular Biology 309
  • Materials Chemistry 118
Replace Janeen L. Vanhooke with:
Janeen L. Vanhooke United States
Natallia V. Strushkevich Belarus
Elizabeth A. Carrey United Kingdom
Sally Ann Holick United States
Peter Påhlsson Sweden
Ursula Sträuli United Kingdom
Kunio Fujiwara Japan
Harold E. Selick United States
Wolfgang E. Trommer Germany
Hong Wei Jin China
Inge Schuster relative to Janeen L. Vanhooke United States Janeen L. Vanhooke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Janeen L. Vanhooke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Schuster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Schuster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Schuster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Schuster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Schuster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Schuster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Schuster. The network helps show where Inge Schuster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inge Schuster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inge Schuster Line = papers co-authored together Inge Schuster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010246
2 2007126
3 1997106
4 197194
5 200189
6 201176
7 200171
8 197163
9 200358
10 199950
11 197246
12 200144
13 200741
14 200333
15 200031
16
Selective inhibitors of vitamin D metabolism--new concepts and perspectives.
200631
17 201129
18 200323
19 196920
20 200919

About Inge Schuster

Inge Schuster is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vitamin D Research Studies (17 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (4 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (4 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (2 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (688 citations), Pharmacology (88 citations), Nephrology (55 citations), Molecular Biology (309 citations) and Materials Chemistry (118 citations). Inge Schuster has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kasper Kirschner, G. Satyanarayana Reddy, Helmut Egger, Rita Bernhardt, Meinrad Peterlik, Heide Sing Cross, David M. Goodall, Ernesto Gallego, Peter Nußbaumer and G. Ellenrieder. Their work appears in journals such as Steroids, European Journal of Biochemistry, Recent results in cancer research, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact