Inez Tuck

1.1k citations
36 papers · 867 · h-index 15

Impact in

  • Health top 1%
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
    • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
    • Family Caregiving in Mental Illness

Papers in

Inez Tuck

36 papers receiving 746 citations

Peers

Inez Tuck
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Health 361
  • Clinical Psychology 320
  • Research and Theory 7
  • General Health Professions 196
  • Applied Psychology 38
Replace Verna Benner Carson with:
Verna Benner Carson United States
Daphne Hewson Australia
Jayani Jayawardhana United States
Rocío de Diego‐Cordero Spain
Martha Gene Meraviglia United States
Vicki P Hines-Martin United States
Gowri Anandarajah United States
Rachel E. Spector United States
Sandra Cristina Pillon Brazil
Benjamin R. Doolittle United States
Inez Tuck relative to Verna Benner Carson United States Verna Benner Carson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×22×
Verna Benner Carson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inez Tuck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inez Tuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inez Tuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inez Tuck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inez Tuck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inez Tuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inez Tuck. The network helps show where Inez Tuck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inez Tuck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inez Tuck Line = papers co-authored together Inez Tuck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001137
2 2008124
3 199774
4 201449
5 200142
6 200641
7 200130
8 201327
9 201226
10 199724
11 200023
12 200222
13 200022
14 199620
15 200718
16 198815
17 200815
18 201215
19 199914
20 199214

About Inez Tuck

Inez Tuck is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 867 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (10 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (361 citations), Clinical Psychology (320 citations), Research and Theory (7 citations), General Health Professions (196 citations) and Applied Psychology (38 citations). Inez Tuck has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nancy L. McCain, Ronald K. Elswick, Debra C. Wallace, Lorraine Anderson, D. Patricia Gray, Jeanne M. Walter, Jessica McKinney Ketchum, Sarah M. Rausch, Cynthia J. Lynn and Jo Lynne W. Robins. Their work appears in journals such as Western Journal of Nursing Research, Journal of Holistic Nursing, Holistic Nursing Practice, Journal of Transcultural Nursing and Brain Behavior and Immunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact