Ines Smyth

915 citations
35 papers · 462 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Smyth

30 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Ines Smyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Gender Studies 118
  • Business and International Management 14
  • Safety Research 44
  • Sociology and Political Science 206
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34
Replace Jo Beall with:
Jo Beall
Akosua K. Darkwah Ghana
Sarah Gammage United States
Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay Netherlands
Mercedes González de la Rocha Mexico
Tanya Jakimow Australia
Aruna Rao United States
Gale Summerfield United States
Elizabeth Katz United States
Shahrashoub Razavi
Ines Smyth relative to Jo Beall Jo Beall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jo Beall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Smyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Smyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Smyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Smyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Smyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Smyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Smyth. The network helps show where Ines Smyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ines Smyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Smyth Line = papers co-authored together Ines Smyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A Guide to Gender-Analysis Frameworks
1999159
2 201557
3 200735
4 199219
5 199117
6
The Disaster Crunch Model: Guidelines for a Gendered Approach
201216
7 199616
8 199714
9 201014
10 201713
11 200411
12 200110
13 20099
14 20029
15
Searching for Security: Women's Responses to Economic Transformations
19969
16 20058
17 20146
18 19985
19 20155
20 20124

About Ines Smyth

Ines Smyth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Development, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (5 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (3 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (3 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (3 papers), Human Rights and Development (3 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (118 citations), Business and International Management (14 citations), Safety Research (44 citations), Sociology and Political Science (206 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (34 citations). Ines Smyth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, Caroline Sweetman, Isa Baud, Colette Harris, Lucy C. Walters, Rashid A. Chotani, Janice L. Cooper, Rosalind Eyben and Sally Theobald. Their work appears in journals such as Gender & Development, Development in Practice, Feminist Economics, Development and Change and IDS Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact