Inès Levade

523 citations
15 papers · 232 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Vibrio bacteria research studies
    • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
    • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
    • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Papers in

Inès Levade

15 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers

Inès Levade
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Endocrinology 67
  • Infectious Diseases 122
  • Modeling and Simulation 25
  • Molecular Medicine 13
  • Immunology 43
Replace Marjahan Akhtar with:
Marjahan Akhtar Bangladesh
Amena Aktar United States
Célia Souque United States
Sarah E. Philo United States
Shirlee Wohl United States
Kaisong Huang China
Priti Devi India
Diederik Brandwagt Netherlands
Mahamoudou Ouattara United States
Radoslaw Poplawski United Kingdom
Inès Levade relative to Marjahan Akhtar Bangladesh Marjahan Akhtar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Marjahan Akhtar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inès Levade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inès Levade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inès Levade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inès Levade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inès Levade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inès Levade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inès Levade. The network helps show where Inès Levade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inès Levade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inès Levade Line = papers co-authored together Inès Levade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201549
2 201635
3 201732
4 202432
5 202022
6 202312
7 20229
8 20217
9 20237
10 20247
11 20237
12 20247
13 20233
14 20232
15 20231

About Inès Levade

Inès Levade is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Epidemiology and Food Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (9 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (5 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (4 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (3 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers) and Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (67 citations), Infectious Diseases (122 citations), Modeling and Simulation (25 citations), Molecular Medicine (13 citations) and Immunology (43 citations). Inès Levade has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include B. Jesse Shapiro, Gabriela Kovacikova, Ronald K. Taylor, Salvador Almagro‐Moreno, Hafid Soualhine, Robyn S. Lee, Jean‐François Proulx, Fiona McIntosh, Nicolas Radomski and Dick Menzies. Their work appears in journals such as Viruses, Microbial Genomics, Clinical Infectious Diseases, mBio and Vaccines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact