Ines Erdmann

538 citations
6 papers · 298 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 2
    • Retinal Development and Disorders 2
    • Cancer-related gene regulation 1
    • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors 1
    • Click Chemistry and Applications 3

Ines Erdmann

6 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Ines Erdmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 107
  • Physiology 25
  • Ophthalmology 29
  • Aging 6
  • Molecular Biology 225
Replace Michael A. Robichaux with:
Michael A. Robichaux United States
Rodman G. Miller United States
Boris Brenerman United States
Isabelle Fruh Switzerland
Robert St. Jules United States
Philip Ropelewski United States
Dragana Trifunović Germany
Stefan Kustermann Germany
Giuseppe Condomitti Belgium
Ines Erdmann relative to Michael A. Robichaux United States Michael A. Robichaux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Michael A. Robichaux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Erdmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Erdmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Erdmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Erdmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Erdmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Erdmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Erdmann. The network helps show where Ines Erdmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Erdmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Erdmann Line = papers co-authored together Ines Erdmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 201597
2 201180
3 201574
4 200937
5 20195
6 20175

About Ines Erdmann

Ines Erdmann is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 6 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Click Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (1 paper), Cancer-related gene regulation (1 paper), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (1 paper), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (1 paper) and Hereditary Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (107 citations), Physiology (25 citations), Ophthalmology (29 citations), Aging (6 citations) and Molecular Biology (225 citations). Ines Erdmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Reichenbach, Antje Wurm, Ulrich Thomas, Daniela C. Dieterich, Julia Bussmann, Erik Storkebaum, Josef A. Käs, Elke Ulbricht, Detlev Schild and Stephan Junek. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Biophysical Journal, Glia and BIO-PROTOCOL.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact