Ines Devlieger
Impact in
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
-
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Papers in
-
- Migration, Health and Trauma 5
- Resilience and Mental Health 1
-
- Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques 4
- Co-authors
- Yves Rosseel (4 shared papers)Axel Mayer (1 shared paper)Johan van Braak (1 shared paper)Jo Tondeur (1 shared paper)Daniël Van Nijlen (1 shared paper)Ruben Vanderlinde (1 shared paper)Koen Aesaert (1 shared paper)Ilse Derluyn (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Ines Devlieger
10 papers receiving 507 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Statistics and Probability 75
- Management Science and Operations Research 108
- Clinical Psychology 129
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 75
- Applied Psychology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Ines Devlieger
This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Devlieger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Devlieger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Devlieger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Devlieger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Devlieger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Devlieger. The network helps show where Ines Devlieger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ines Devlieger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 134 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 120 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 6 |
About Ines Devlieger
Ines Devlieger is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 10 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (4 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (3 papers), Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees (2 papers), Digital literacy in education (1 paper), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (75 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (108 citations), Clinical Psychology (129 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 citations) and Applied Psychology (20 citations). Ines Devlieger has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Yves Rosseel, Axel Mayer, Johan van Braak, Jo Tondeur, Daniël Van Nijlen, Ruben Vanderlinde, Koen Aesaert, Ilse Derluyn, Elisa Pfeiffer and Ine Lietaert. Their work appears in journals such as Educational and Psychological Measurement, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Journal of Youth and Adolescence and Methodology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.