Ines Devlieger

840 citations
10 papers · 495 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Devlieger

10 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

Ines Devlieger
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Statistics and Probability 72
  • Management Science and Operations Research 103
  • Clinical Psychology 128
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 74
  • Applied Psychology 18
Replace Anne Corinne Huggins‐Manley with:
Anne Corinne Huggins‐Manley United States
Ernest C. Davenport United States
Hamzeh Dodeen United Arab Emirates
Hairong Song United States
Kuan‐Yu Jin Hong Kong
Chunhua Cao United States
Hsien‐Yuan Hsu United States
Carmen Ximénez Spain
Robert D. Ankenmann United States
Bas T. Hemker Netherlands
Ines Devlieger relative to Anne Corinne Huggins‐Manley United States Anne Corinne Huggins‐Manley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Anne Corinne Huggins‐Manley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Devlieger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Devlieger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Devlieger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Devlieger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Devlieger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Devlieger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Devlieger. The network helps show where Ines Devlieger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ines Devlieger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Devlieger Line = papers co-authored together Ines Devlieger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2015130
2 2017118
3 201561
4 202152
5 202231
6 201930
7 201925
8 202222
9 202220
10 20226

About Ines Devlieger

Ines Devlieger is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 10 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (4 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (3 papers), Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees (2 papers), Digital literacy in education (1 paper), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (72 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (103 citations), Clinical Psychology (128 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (74 citations) and Applied Psychology (18 citations). Ines Devlieger has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Yves Rosseel, Axel Mayer, Koen Aesaert, Daniël Van Nijlen, Ruben Vanderlinde, Jo Tondeur, Ilse Derluyn, Johan van Braak, Elisa Pfeiffer and Ine Lietaert. Their work appears in journals such as Educational and Psychological Measurement, Multivariate Behavioral Research, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Computers & Education and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact