İncilay Lay

54 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers

İncilay Lay
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Gastroenterology 50
  • Pharmacy 30
  • Physiology 126
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 56
  • Otorhinolaryngology 13
Replace Ivan Cancarevic with:
Ivan Cancarevic United States
D Rieu France
M.H. Otten Netherlands
Daniel Castellano‐Castillo Spain
S. M. Zhang United States
Süleyman Ayvaz Türkiye
D Gaburro Italy
Rosa Jiménez-Lucena Spain
Tara Loux United States
İncilay Lay relative to Ivan Cancarevic United States Ivan Cancarevic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Ivan Cancarevic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by İncilay Lay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of İncilay Lay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by İncilay Lay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites İncilay Lay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by İncilay Lay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by İncilay Lay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by İncilay Lay. The network helps show where İncilay Lay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside İncilay Lay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with İncilay Lay Line = papers co-authored together İncilay Lay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200872
2 202066
3 201045
4 201842
5 201939
6 201836
7 200933
8 201427
9 201926
10 202018
11 202017
12 202315
13 202113
14 202013
15 202112
16 201011
17 200810
18 201910
19 20209
20 20219

About İncilay Lay

İncilay Lay is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 56 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (8 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (5 papers), Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling (5 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (4 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (4 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (3 papers) and Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (50 citations), Pharmacy (30 citations), Physiology (126 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (56 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (13 citations). İncilay Lay has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Afshin Samadi, Filiz Akbıyık, Ahmet Yalçınkaya, Geir Bjørklund, Süleyman Nahit Şendur, Salvatore Chirumbolo, Ahmet Emre Süslü, Suna Sabuncuoğlu, Ömer Afşın Özmen and Oğuz Öǧretmenoǧlu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Investigative Medicine, HORMONES, Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact