Ina Berg

51 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

Ina Berg
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Archeology 23
  • Applied Mathematics 223
  • Mathematical Physics 186
  • Algebra and Number Theory 94
  • Geometry and Topology 177
Replace J. L. Berggren with:
J. L. Berggren Canada
Udo Simon Germany
Robert S. Lehman United States
Félix Klein Germany
M. J. Field United States
Detlef Laugwitz Germany
Roderick Wong Hong Kong
Mikhail G. Katz Israel
Philippe Tondeur United States
Herbert Meschkowski Germany
Ina Berg relative to J. L. Berggren Canada J. L. Berggren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
J. L. Berggren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ina Berg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Berg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Berg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Berg. The network helps show where Ina Berg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ina Berg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ina Berg Line = papers co-authored together Ina Berg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008131
2 200779
3 197163
4 198949
5 200844
6 197932
7 199828
8 198727
9 200923
10 200621
11 198420
12 199320
13 196220
14 200418
15 199118
16 197517
17 196411
18 199810
19 198710
20 19688

About Ina Berg

Ina Berg is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Archeology, Mathematical Physics, Paleontology and Geometry and Topology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (9 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (8 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (8 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (8 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (7 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (6 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (6 papers) and Advanced Operator Algebra Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (23 citations), Applied Mathematics (223 citations), Mathematical Physics (186 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (94 citations) and Geometry and Topology (177 citations). Ina Berg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Igor Nikolaev, Richard L. Bishop, Stephanie Alexander, Kenneth R. Davidson, Brailey Sims, St. Kubicki, Albert Wilansky, Maarten Milders, Betto G. Deelman and Nicholas P. Jewell. Their work appears in journals such as The Michigan Mathematical Journal, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Archaeological Science and Canadian Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact