Ina Aneva
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Papers in
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 21
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 6
- Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies 6
- Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions 6
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 7
- Co-authors
- Mohammad Hosein Farzaei (15 shared papers)Sajad Fakhri (3 shared papers)Eduardo Sobarzo‐Sánchez (1 shared paper)Andrey S. Marchev (6 shared papers)Milen I. Georgiev (4 shared papers)P. Zhelev (17 shared papers)Антоанета Трендафилова (12 shared papers)Milka Todorova (10 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Ina Aneva
73 papers receiving 926 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Biochemistry 155
- Complementary and alternative medicine 104
- Pharmacology 97
- Food Science 197
- Plant Science 381
Countries citing papers authored by Ina Aneva
This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Aneva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Aneva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Aneva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Aneva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Aneva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Aneva. The network helps show where Ina Aneva may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ina Aneva, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 8 | Poisoning by Medical Plants. | 2020 | 37 |
| 9 | 2023 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 14 |
About Ina Aneva
Ina Aneva is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Biochemistry and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 81 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (21 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (18 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (10 papers), Medicinal plant effects and applications (7 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (7 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (6 papers) and Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (155 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (104 citations), Pharmacology (97 citations), Food Science (197 citations) and Plant Science (381 citations). Ina Aneva has collaborated with scholars based in Bulgaria, Iran and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Mohammad Hosein Farzaei, Sajad Fakhri, Eduardo Sobarzo‐Sánchez, Andrey S. Marchev, Milen I. Georgiev, P. Zhelev, Антоанета Трендафилова, Milka Todorova, Javier Echeverría and Milena Nikolova. Their work appears in journals such as Plants, Diversity, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Chemistry & Biodiversity and Phytomedicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.