Imen Dahech
Impact in
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
- Food composition and properties
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization
Papers in
-
- Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology 9
-
- Diet, Metabolism, and Disease 6
- Co-authors
- Hafedh Belghith (9 shared papers)Karima Belghith (9 shared papers)Hafedh Mejdoub (9 shared papers)Abdelfattah El Feki (4 shared papers)Khaled Hamden (4 shared papers)Mohamed Trigui (1 shared paper)Ferjani Ben Abdallah (1 shared paper)Jawhar Fakhfakh (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (9 papers)Industrial Crops and Products (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Tunisia
In The Last Decade
Imen Dahech
11 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Nutrition and Dietetics 276
- Biotechnology 149
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 106
- Biochemistry 38
- Food Science 86
Countries citing papers authored by Imen Dahech
This map shows the geographic impact of Imen Dahech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imen Dahech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imen Dahech more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Imen Dahech
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Imen Dahech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Imen Dahech. The network helps show where Imen Dahech may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Imen Dahech, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 11 | Optimization of levan production from Bacillus licheniformis using response surface methodology | 2014 | 1 |
About Imen Dahech
Imen Dahech is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biotechnology, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (9 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (6 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (5 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (4 papers), Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds (1 paper), Phytase and its Applications (1 paper), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (1 paper) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (276 citations), Biotechnology (149 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (106 citations), Biochemistry (38 citations) and Food Science (86 citations). Imen Dahech has collaborated with scholars based in Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include Hafedh Belghith, Karima Belghith, Hafedh Mejdoub, Abdelfattah El Feki, Khaled Hamden, Mohamed Trigui, Ferjani Ben Abdallah, Jawhar Fakhfakh, Mohamed Damak and Imen Fendri. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Biological Macromolecules and Industrial Crops and Products.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.