Iman Aolymat

19 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers

Iman Aolymat
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Modeling and Simulation 74
  • Clinical Psychology 188
  • Health 72
  • Infectious Diseases 131
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 52
Replace Shajeea Arshad Ali with:
Shajeea Arshad Ali Pakistan
Preethi Sundararaman United States
Balsam Qubais Saeed United Arab Emirates
Amin A. Aqel Jordan
Ashraf I. Khasawneh Jordan
Ahmet Rıza Şahin Türkiye
Mustapha Mohammed Nigeria
Caterina Silvestri Italy
Amruta Radhakrishnan Canada
Guoxi Cai Japan
Iman Aolymat relative to Shajeea Arshad Ali Pakistan Shajeea Arshad Ali's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Shajeea Arshad Ali · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iman Aolymat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iman Aolymat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iman Aolymat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iman Aolymat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iman Aolymat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iman Aolymat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iman Aolymat. The network helps show where Iman Aolymat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iman Aolymat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iman Aolymat Line = papers co-authored together Iman Aolymat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020154
2 2020140
3 202056
4 202056
5 201930
6 202030
7 202228
8 202425
9 202319
10 202414
11 20246
12 20236
13 20243
14 20233
15 20233
16 20232
17 20241
18 20241
19 20241
20
The association of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene polymorphisms and diabetic retinopathy among patients with type 2 diabetes: A case-control study.
20240

About Iman Aolymat

Iman Aolymat is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (4 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (3 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (3 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (74 citations), Clinical Psychology (188 citations), Health (72 citations), Infectious Diseases (131 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (52 citations). Iman Aolymat has collaborated with scholars based in Jordan, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Amin N. Olaimat, Richard A. Holley, Hafiz Muhammad Shahbaz, Tareq M. Osaili, Anas A. Al‐Nabulsi, Mutamed Ayyash, Murad Al‐Holy, Shao‐Quan Liu, Mahmoud Abu Ghoush and Vasso Apostolopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Scientific Reports, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Medicine and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact