Ilya E. Garber
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
-
- Ethics in Business and Education
Papers in
-
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology 4
-
- Ethics in Business and Education 4
- Co-authors
- James Hou-fu Liu (3 shared papers)Katja Hanke (2 shared papers)Denis Hilton (2 shared papers)Feixue Wang (1 shared paper)Cecilia Gastardo‐Conaco (1 shared paper)Silvia Mari (1 shared paper)Lili Huang (1 shared paper)Michał Bilewicz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Business Ethics (2 papers)Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (1 paper)Review of General Psychology (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Management and Organization Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Ilya E. Garber
12 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- General Decision Sciences 26
- Information Systems and Management 77
- Social Psychology 90
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 46
- Accounting 36
Countries citing papers authored by Ilya E. Garber
This map shows the geographic impact of Ilya E. Garber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ilya E. Garber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ilya E. Garber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ilya E. Garber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ilya E. Garber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ilya E. Garber. The network helps show where Ilya E. Garber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ilya E. Garber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 85 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 0 |
About Ilya E. Garber
Ilya E. Garber is a scholar working on General Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Social Sciences, having authored 15 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corruption and Economic Development (4 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (1 paper), Information Society and Technology Trends (1 paper) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (26 citations), Information Systems and Management (77 citations), Social Psychology (90 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (46 citations) and Accounting (36 citations). Ilya E. Garber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include James Hou-fu Liu, Katja Hanke, Denis Hilton, Feixue Wang, Cecilia Gastardo‐Conaco, Silvia Mari, Lili Huang, Michał Bilewicz, Darío Páez and Olivier Klein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Review of General Psychology, PLoS ONE and Management and Organization Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.