I‐Jen Chen

40 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

I‐Jen Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 216
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 495
  • Polymers and Plastics 177
  • Molecular Biology 768
  • Virology 43
Replace Qiang Shao with:
Qiang Shao China
Concepción Abad Spain
Nathan Schmid Switzerland
Bruno A. C. Horta Brazil
Israel Cabeza de Vaca United States
Alan Sousa da Silva United Kingdom
E. Prabhu Raman United States
Uko Maran Estonia
Alexandra Choutko Switzerland
Qi-Shi Du China
I‐Jen Chen relative to Qiang Shao China Qiang Shao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Qiang Shao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I‐Jen Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I‐Jen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I‐Jen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I‐Jen Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I‐Jen Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I‐Jen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I‐Jen Chen. The network helps show where I‐Jen Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I‐Jen Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I‐Jen Chen Line = papers co-authored together I‐Jen Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998147
2 2010145
3 2001103
4 197297
5 197197
6 200891
7 200490
8 200983
9 200480
10 201375
11 200958
12 200756
13
Informatics and modeling challenges in fragment-based drug discovery.
200747
14 200446
15 197243
16 201640
17 200037
18 200233
19 201629
20 200026

About I‐Jen Chen

I‐Jen Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (14 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (7 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (5 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (4 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers), Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (2 papers) and Superconducting and THz Device Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (216 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (495 citations), Polymers and Plastics (177 citations), Molecular Biology (768 citations) and Virology (43 citations). I‐Jen Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Nicolas Foloppe, Roderick E. Hubbard, Alexander D. MacKerell, D. C. Bogue, Ben Davis, Daxu Yin, James L. White, Yang‐Hwei Tsuang, Yi‐Shiong Hang and Fung‐Jou Lu. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid and IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact