Igor Khmelinskii

192 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Igor Khmelinskii
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Analytical Chemistry 808
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 556
  • Biochemistry 266
  • Biophysics 238
  • Biomaterials 483
Replace Marek Sikorski with:
Marek Sikorski Poland
Douglas Wagner Franco Brazil
Digambara Patra Lebanon
Mohamed Mathlouthi France
Maria João Melo Portugal
J.P. Huvenne France
Nicolae Leopold Romania
Mengxia Xie China
Anwar Usman Brunei
Martin M. F. Choi Hong Kong
Igor Khmelinskii relative to Marek Sikorski Poland Marek Sikorski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Marek Sikorski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Igor Khmelinskii

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Igor Khmelinskii's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Igor Khmelinskii with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Igor Khmelinskii more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Igor Khmelinskii

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Igor Khmelinskii. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Igor Khmelinskii. The network helps show where Igor Khmelinskii may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Igor Khmelinskii, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Igor Khmelinskii Line = papers co-authored together Igor Khmelinskii links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 198 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012337
2 2004163
3 2017132
4 2004126
5 2004124
6
Tocopherol content in edible plant oils
200789
7 201582
8 200582
9 200781
10 200877
11 201273
12 200570
13 201269
14 200265
15 200562
16 199561
17 200557
18 201953
19 200452
20 200448

About Igor Khmelinskii

Igor Khmelinskii is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 198 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (47 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (24 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (23 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (23 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (16 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (14 papers), Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (12 papers) and bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (808 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (556 citations), Biochemistry (266 citations), Biophysics (238 citations) and Biomaterials (483 citations). Igor Khmelinskii has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Puerto Rico and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Ewa Sikorska, Marek Sikorski, Vladimir I. Makarov, Margarida C. Vieira, Rui M.S. Cruz, António A. Vicente, Javiera F. Rubilar, J.L. Bourdelande, Tomasz Górecki and Jacek Koput. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Physics, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, Chemical Physics Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact