Igor Douven

150 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Igor Douven
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • General Decision Sciences 340
  • History and Philosophy of Science 712
  • Philosophy 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 761
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 566
Replace Tania Lombrozo with:
Tania Lombrozo United States
Paul K. Moser United States
Robert Stalnaker United States
Daniel N. Osherson United States
Keith Lehrer United States
Stephen P. Stich United States
Jaakko Hintikka United States
John L. Pollock United States
David Lewis United States
Paul M. Churchland United States
Igor Douven relative to Tania Lombrozo United States Tania Lombrozo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Tania Lombrozo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Igor Douven

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Igor Douven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Igor Douven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Igor Douven more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Igor Douven

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Igor Douven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Igor Douven. The network helps show where Igor Douven may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Igor Douven, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Igor Douven Line = papers co-authored together Igor Douven links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 158 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014210
2 2006187
3 200784
4 201784
5 201069
6 200657
7 201354
8 201552
9 199951
10 201151
11 199749
12 201047
13 201546
14 201845
15 201544
16 200744
17 201242
18 202239
19 200239
20 201338

About Igor Douven

Igor Douven is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and General Decision Sciences, having authored 158 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (67 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (64 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (46 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (22 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (14 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers) and Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (340 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (712 citations), Philosophy (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (761 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (566 citations). Igor Douven has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Sylvia Wenmackers, Lieven Decock, Danny E. P. Vanpoucke, Jonah N. Schupbach, Alexander Riegler, Timothy Williamson, R. D. Dietz, Yasmina Jraissati, Leon Horsten and Shira Elqayam. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Erkenntnis, dialectica, Cognition and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact