I.D. Parkman
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Livestock and Poultry Management
- Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
- Small Animals top 5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 4
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 4
-
- Insect and Pesticide Research 1
- Insect Utilization and Effects 1
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- L. J. Wilkins (3 shared papers)N.G. Gregory (2 shared papers)T. G. Knowles (1 shared paper)Christine J Nicol (1 shared paper)S.B. Wotton (3 shared papers)Eric Dransfield (1 shared paper)N. G. Gregory (1 shared paper)P.E. Whittington (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Poultry Science (1 paper)Meat Science (1 paper)Applied Animal Behaviour Science (1 paper)British Poultry Science (1 paper)The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
I.D. Parkman
6 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Animal Science and Zoology 288
- Small Animals 118
- Parasitology 20
- Insect Science 38
- Developmental Biology 6
Countries citing papers authored by I.D. Parkman
This map shows the geographic impact of I.D. Parkman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.D. Parkman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.D. Parkman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I.D. Parkman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.D. Parkman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.D. Parkman. The network helps show where I.D. Parkman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside I.D. Parkman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 166 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 38 | |
| 4 | Electrical stunning of cattle. | 2000 | 37 |
| 5 | 1999 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 15 |
About I.D. Parkman
I.D. Parkman is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 6 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper), Insect Utilization and Effects (1 paper), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (1 paper) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (288 citations), Small Animals (118 citations), Parasitology (20 citations), Insect Science (38 citations) and Developmental Biology (6 citations). I.D. Parkman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include L. J. Wilkins, N.G. Gregory, T. G. Knowles, Christine J Nicol, S.B. Wotton, Eric Dransfield, N. G. Gregory, P.E. Whittington, A. J. Phillips and R.I. Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Meat Science, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, British Poultry Science and The Journal of Applied Poultry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.