I‐Chen Lin

559 citations
40 papers · 259 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

I‐Chen Lin

38 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

I‐Chen Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 180
  • Human-Computer Interaction 41
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 23
  • Geology 20
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 22
Replace Chavdar Papazov with:
Chavdar Papazov Germany
Diego Thomas Japan
Nikolaos Sarafianos United States
Guoxian Song Singapore
Adam W. Harley United States
Sandra Alemany Spain
Nicola D'Apuzzo Switzerland
Lin Gui China
Frank B. ter Haar Netherlands
Jan Čech Czechia
I‐Chen Lin relative to Chavdar Papazov Germany Chavdar Papazov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Chavdar Papazov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I‐Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I‐Chen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I‐Chen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I‐Chen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I‐Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I‐Chen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I‐Chen Lin. The network helps show where I‐Chen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I‐Chen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I‐Chen Lin Line = papers co-authored together I‐Chen Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201633
2 200524
3 200221
4 202119
5 202218
6 201316
7 202215
8 201014
9 201111
10 20029
11 20188
12 20237
13 20157
14 20036
15 20164
16 20174
17 20174
18 20044
19
Expression detail mapping for realistic facial animation
20033
20 20153

About I‐Chen Lin

I‐Chen Lin is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering, Surgery and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 40 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Vision and Imaging (9 papers), Face recognition and analysis (8 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (6 papers), Human Pose and Action Recognition (6 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (6 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers) and Human Motion and Animation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (180 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (41 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (23 citations), Geology (20 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (22 citations). I‐Chen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Japan and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Ming‐Han Tsai, Ming Ouhyoung, Li-Chen Wu, Chien‐Yi Huang, Cheng-Hao Chen, Wen‐Chieh Lin, Kwan‐Liu Ma, Chi‐Wen Chen, Chieh‐Yu Liu and Keng-hao Chang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Multimedia Tools and Applications, The Visual Computer, Computer Graphics Forum and Obesity Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact