Ian Swift
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Gina Brown (9 shared papers)Paris Tekkis (6 shared papers)David Sebag‐Montefiore (3 shared papers)Fiona Taylor (3 shared papers)Lennart Blomqvist (3 shared papers)Philip Quirke (3 shared papers)Brendan Moran (3 shared papers)Richard J. Heald (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 papers)British Journal of Radiology (2 papers)European Journal of Surgical Oncology (2 papers)Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (1 paper)Annals of Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenAustralia
In The Last Decade
Ian Swift
15 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Ian Swift's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Oncology 1.2k
- Surgery 472
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 226
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 121
- Reproductive Medicine 24
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Swift
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Swift more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Swift
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Swift. The network helps show where Ian Swift may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Swift, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Detected Tumor Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Predicts Survival Outcomes: MERCURY Experience Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 489 |
| 2 | 2011 | 438 | |
| 3 | Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Circumferential Resection Margin Predicts Disease-Free Survival and Local Recurrence: 5-Year Follow-Up Results of the MERCURY Study Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 395 |
| 4 | 2006 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 1 |
About Ian Swift
Ian Swift is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Reproductive Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (7 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), MRI in cancer diagnosis (1 paper), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (1 paper) and Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.2k citations), Surgery (472 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (226 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (121 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (24 citations). Ian Swift has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gina Brown, Paris Tekkis, David Sebag‐Montefiore, Fiona Taylor, Lennart Blomqvist, Philip Quirke, Brendan Moran, Richard J. Heald, Nicola Bees and Christopher George. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Radiology, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum and Annals of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.