Ian Schofield

2.6k citations
99 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Ian Schofield

95 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Ian Schofield
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 457
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 378
  • Neurology 346
  • Geophysics 211
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 285
Replace Jun Kimura with:
Jun Kimura Japan
Edgar A. Bering United States
Éric Thouvenot France
John H. Thomas United States
Deborah J. Henderson United Kingdom
Michael C. Kelly United States
John C. Haselgrove United States
David L. Daniels United States
Chiaki Kobayashi United Kingdom
G. La Rosa Italy
Ian Schofield relative to Jun Kimura Japan Jun Kimura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jun Kimura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Schofield. The network helps show where Ian Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Schofield Line = papers co-authored together Ian Schofield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018110
2 2005105
3 2008102
4 201375
5 200374
6 200973
7 199154
8 200753
9 198648
10 198647
11 201347
12 200742
13 201840
14 200738
15 199535
16 201634
17 200032
18 199530
19 200828
20 199526

About Ian Schofield

Ian Schofield is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Geophysics, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (22 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (20 papers), Earthquake Detection and Analysis (12 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (12 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (7 papers) and Peripheral Nerve Disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (457 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (378 citations), Neurology (346 citations), Geophysics (211 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (285 citations). Ian Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. Fawcett, Martin Connors, Miles A. Whittington, Roger D. Traub, Anders Fuglsang‐Frederiksen, Birger Johnsen, Mark O. Cunningham, Wilfred A. Nix, Rocco Liguori and Mamede de Carvalho. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Neurophysiology, Earth Planets and Space, Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact