Ian Schmid

790 citations
22 papers · 436 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ian Schmid

22 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers

Ian Schmid
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Statistics and Probability 65
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 40
  • General Health Professions 53
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 11
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 53
Replace Zoë Skea with:
Zoë Skea United Kingdom
McKee United Kingdom
Laura Eckhardt United States
Jim Nuovo United States
Zelda Tomlin United Kingdom
Dennis Deck United States
Samuel L. Brilleman Australia
Elizabeth R. Stevens United States
Katy E. Morgan United Kingdom
Sara Hart United States
Ian Schmid relative to Zoë Skea United Kingdom Zoë Skea's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Zoë Skea · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Schmid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Schmid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Schmid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Schmid. The network helps show where Ian Schmid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Schmid Line = papers co-authored together Ian Schmid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015122
2 201748
3 201533
4 201826
5 202225
6 202121
7 201821
8 202219
9 202117
10 202217
11 202111
12 202211
13 202210
14 20199
15 20229
16 19978
17 20208
18 20147
19 20236
20 20215

About Ian Schmid

Ian Schmid is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (8 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (5 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (65 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (40 citations), General Health Professions (53 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (11 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (53 citations). Ian Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth A. Stuart, Thomas A Trikalinos, Christopher H. Schmid, Issa J Dahabreh, Christopher Halladay, John W. Jackson, Julie M. Zito, Benjamin Ackerman, Mehmet Burcu and Kayla N. Tormohlen. Their work appears in journals such as Patient, Epidemiologic Reviews, Journal of Community Psychology, Public Health and Prevention Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact