Ian Pike

158 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Ian Pike
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Reproductive Medicine 245
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 275
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 112
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 670
  • Emergency Medicine 156
Replace Thomas J. Songer with:
Thomas J. Songer United States
Abdulbari Bener Qatar
Peter Cummings United States
David A. Klein United States
Daniel M. Sosin United States
Mary C. Sheehan Australia
James W. Collins United States
Remy A. Hirasing Netherlands
Melissa A. Schiff United States
Leanne Kmet Canada
Ian Pike relative to Thomas J. Songer United States Thomas J. Songer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Thomas J. Songer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Pike. The network helps show where Ian Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Pike Line = papers co-authored together Ian Pike links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 168 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012255
2 1986161
3 198787
4 201472
5 202069
6 199769
7 198567
8 202162
9 198958
10 201850
11 201045
12 201145
13 200942
14 201437
15 200434
16 199432
17 201432
18 200831
19 200730
20 201229

About Ian Pike

Ian Pike is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 168 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (61 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (33 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (16 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (12 papers), Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (10 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (7 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (7 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (245 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (275 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (112 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (670 citations) and Emergency Medicine (156 citations). Ian Pike has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mariana Brussoni, C. O’Neill, Douglas M. Saunders, Lise Olsen, David A. Sleet, A. A. Gidley-Baird, Ediriweera Desapriya, Michael J. Sinosich, R. N. Porter and Alison Macpherson. Their work appears in journals such as Injury Prevention, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Reproduction and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact