David D. Ackerly
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 0.01%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.01%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 116
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 57
- Co-authors
- Campbell O. Webb (9 shared papers)William K. Cornwell (12 shared papers)Michael J. Donoghue (4 shared papers)Steven W. Kembel (3 shared papers)Nathan J. B. Kraft (12 shared papers)Mark A. McPeek (1 shared paper)Dylan W. Schwilk (5 shared papers)Peter D. Cowan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Ecology (12 papers)Global Change Biology (12 papers)Journal of Ecology (11 papers)New Phytologist (10 papers)American Journal of Botany (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaMexico
In The Last Decade
David D. Ackerly
193 papers receiving 45.2k citations
David D. Ackerly's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
- Ecological Modeling 10.3k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 25.8k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 18.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 12.6k
- Ecology 12.4k
Countries citing papers authored by David D. Ackerly
This map shows the geographic impact of David D. Ackerly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David D. Ackerly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David D. Ackerly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David D. Ackerly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David D. Ackerly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David D. Ackerly. The network helps show where David D. Ackerly may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David D. Ackerly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 195 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The worldwide leaf economics spectrum Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 7016 |
| 2 | Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 4962 |
| 3 | Phylogenies and Community Ecology Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 3768 |
| 4 | TRY – a global database of plant traits Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 2145 |
| 5 | The velocity of climate change Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 2013 |
| 6 | Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 1594 |
| 7 | Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 1510 |
| 8 | A TRAIT-BASED TEST FOR HABITAT FILTERING: CONVEX HULL VOLUME Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 1051 |
| 9 | Functional Traits and Niche-Based Tree Community Assembly in an Amazonian Forest Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 998 |
| 10 | Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 984 |
| 11 | Phylogenetic Overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 755 |
| 12 | Community Assembly, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptive Evolution in Changing Environments Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 714 |
| 13 | ARE FUNCTIONAL TRAITS GOOD PREDICTORS OF DEMOGRAPHIC RATES? EVIDENCE FROM FIVE NEOTROPICAL FORESTS Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 651 |
| 14 | A trait‐based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within‐ and among‐community components Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 648 |
| 15 | Trait Evolution, Community Assembly, and the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 620 |
| 16 | Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 579 |
| 17 | A Brief History of Seed Size Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 543 |
| 18 | 2010 | 525 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 521 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 464 |
About David D. Ackerly
David D. Ackerly is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change and Plant Science, having authored 195 papers that have together received 46.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (116 papers), Plant and animal studies (79 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (57 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (38 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (15 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (15 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (12 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (10.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (25.8k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (18.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (12.6k citations) and Ecology (12.4k citations). David D. Ackerly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Campbell O. Webb, William K. Cornwell, Michael J. Donoghue, Steven W. Kembel, Nathan J. B. Kraft, Mark A. McPeek, Dylan W. Schwilk, Peter D. Cowan, Matthew R. Helmus and Simon Phillip Blomberg. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Global Change Biology, Journal of Ecology, New Phytologist and American Journal of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.