Ian Howe

2.0k citations
44 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Ian Howe

44 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Ian Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Spectroscopy 1.0k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 175
  • Analytical Chemistry 184
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 371
  • Organic Chemistry 321
Replace Burnaby Munson with:
Burnaby Munson United States
Roger N. Hayes United States
I. Džidić United States
Xueheng Cheng United States
M. S. B. Munson United States
A.G. Brenton United Kingdom
N. M. M. Nibbering Netherlands
R. N. Stillwell United States
Gary W. Caldwell United States
Carolyn J. Cassady United States
Ian Howe relative to Burnaby Munson United States Burnaby Munson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Burnaby Munson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Howe. The network helps show where Ian Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Howe Line = papers co-authored together Ian Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973284
2 1984243
3 1969125
4
Principles of organic mass spectrometry
1972102
5 197170
6
Mass spectrometry: Principles and applications
198151
7 196950
8 196848
9 197042
10 198040
11 197640
12 198037
13 198137
14 197235
15 196835
16 198031
17 197130
18 196829
19 197127
20 198325

About Ian Howe

Ian Howe is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Ecology, Biomedical Engineering and Organic Chemistry, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (30 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (20 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (4 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (4 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (1.0k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (175 citations), Analytical Chemistry (184 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (371 citations) and Organic Chemistry (321 citations). Ian Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dudley H. Williams, Fred W. McLafferty, R. Graham Cooks, P. F. Bente, R.A. Kornfeld, S. Cheng Tsai, J. H. Beynon, John Bales, Jeremy K. Nicholson and Peter J. Sadler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Tetrahedron, Clinical Chemistry and Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact