I. Ford

2.5k citations
66 papers · 2.1k · h-index 25

Impact in

    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Neurology top 5%
    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Papers in

I. Ford

66 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

I. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Internal Medicine 103
  • Neurology 152
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 353
  • Hematology 170
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 196
Replace Michael Knoflach with:
Michael Knoflach Austria
Michael T. Watkins United States
Hee‐Jin Kim South Korea
D. Köhler Germany
Peter B. Kurnik United States
Yutaka Inaba Japan
Karsten Overgaard Denmark
Donata Guidetti Italy
Shuzo Kobayashi Japan
Cara L. Carty United States
I. Ford relative to Michael Knoflach Austria Michael Knoflach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
Michael Knoflach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Ford. The network helps show where I. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Ford Line = papers co-authored together I. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987282
2 2003177
3 2013129
4 2006101
5 200482
6 200181
7 201371
8 199063
9 200559
10 200954
11 200954
12 200751
13 200751
14 199748
15 199346
16 200442
17 201242
18 201240
19 199740
20 200738

About I. Ford

I. Ford is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Hematology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peripheral Artery Disease Management (9 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (8 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (3 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (103 citations), Neurology (152 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (353 citations), Hematology (170 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (196 citations). I. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Greaves, Julie Brittenden, Paul Bachoo, M. Greaves, David I. Graham, Kevin Cassar, Taku Shigeno, Karen A. Osborne, Graham M. Teasdale and James McCulloch. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Haematology, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, British journal of surgery and Platelets.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact