I. Chowers

66 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

I. Chowers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 345
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 233
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 312
  • Physiology 289
  • Biological Psychiatry 27
Replace H. S. Lipscomb with:
H. S. Lipscomb United States
George A. Hedge United States
CATHERINE F. ALLEN United States
T. Jolín Spain
Brian Gillham United Kingdom
Thomas L. Garthwaite United States
E. Stark Hungary
L. Cass Terry United States
J. C. Buckingham United Kingdom
Kyriaki Gerozissis France
I. Chowers relative to H. S. Lipscomb United States H. S. Lipscomb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
H. S. Lipscomb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Chowers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Chowers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Chowers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Chowers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Chowers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Chowers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Chowers. The network helps show where I. Chowers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Chowers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Chowers Line = papers co-authored together I. Chowers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971127
2 1957127
3 198061
4 196659
5 198248
6 196645
7 198242
8 196538
9 196335
10 196934
11 198134
12 196833
13 196730
14 198026
15 196125
16 197125
17 200323
18 196918
19
Differential effects of hypothalamic deafferentation on responses to different stresses.
196918
20 196418

About I. Chowers

I. Chowers is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Physiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Molecular Biology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (31 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (12 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (11 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (6 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (345 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (233 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (312 citations), Physiology (289 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (27 citations). I. Chowers has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include N. Conforti, R.A. Siegel, Joseph Weidenfeld, S. Feldman, B. Shapiro, G. Rose, S. Lavy, L. Halpern, Samuel M. McCann and Steven R. Feldman. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroendocrinology, Brain Research, American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, Experimental Brain Research and European Journal of Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact