Hui Ding

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Hui Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Pollution 287
  • Catalysis 143
  • Water Science and Technology 270
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 119
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 214
Replace Wei-Yin Chen with:
Wei-Yin Chen United States
Qinglin Xie China
Guangcan Zhu China
Zhiyan Pan China
Panchamoorthy Saravanan India
Qinghong Wang China
Deborah J. Roberts Canada
Jing Yuan China
Hui Ding relative to Wei-Yin Chen United States Wei-Yin Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Wei-Yin Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hui Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hui Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hui Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hui Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hui Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hui Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hui Ding. The network helps show where Hui Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hui Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hui Ding Line = papers co-authored together Hui Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006117
2 200782
3 202276
4 201375
5 202072
6 201061
7 201757
8 201554
9 202052
10 202451
11 202050
12 202047
13 202044
14 201642
15 202040
16 201936
17 200932
18 201332
19 201530
20 202427

About Hui Ding

Hui Ding is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Catalysis, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology and Pollution, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (16 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (12 papers), Heavy metals in environment (6 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (5 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (5 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (4 papers) and Arsenic contamination and mitigation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (287 citations), Catalysis (143 citations), Water Science and Technology (270 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (119 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (214 citations). Hui Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Shejiang Liu, Yong‐Guan Zhu, Dan Zhao, Jianfeng Fu, Xingang Li, Gang Kevin Li, Jinhua Zhao, Mingyi Wu, Yupeng Guo and Yongqiang Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Separation and Purification Technology, Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Environmental Technology, Environmental Pollution and Journal of Environmental Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact