Hsing‐Ching Kuo

1.5k citations
35 papers · 991 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Hsing‐Ching Kuo

35 papers receiving 972 citations

Peers

Hsing‐Ching Kuo
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 574
  • Rehabilitation 196
  • Neurology 207
  • Neurology 189
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 179
Replace Ya‐Ching Hung with:
Ya‐Ching Hung United States
Theresa Sukal‐Moulton United States
Bernadette T. Gillick United States
Chung‐Yao Chen Taiwan
Ana Raquel Rodrigues Lindquist Brazil
Lisa Mailleux Belgium
Anna Mackey New Zealand
Sebastian Grunt Switzerland
Laurent Ballaz Canada
Jaya Shanker Tedla Saudi Arabia
Hsing‐Ching Kuo relative to Ya‐Ching Hung United States Ya‐Ching Hung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Ya‐Ching Hung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hsing‐Ching Kuo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hsing‐Ching Kuo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hsing‐Ching Kuo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hsing‐Ching Kuo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hsing‐Ching Kuo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hsing‐Ching Kuo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hsing‐Ching Kuo. The network helps show where Hsing‐Ching Kuo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hsing‐Ching Kuo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hsing‐Ching Kuo Line = papers co-authored together Hsing‐Ching Kuo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011236
2 201279
3 201675
4 201564
5 201645
6 201744
7 201342
8 200937
9 201836
10 201633
11 201928
12 201826
13 201425
14 201524
15 201823
16 201723
17 201822
18 201720
19 202119
20 201518

About Hsing‐Ching Kuo

Hsing‐Ching Kuo is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Neurology, Rehabilitation and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 35 papers that have together received 991 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (15 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (13 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (574 citations), Rehabilitation (196 citations), Neurology (207 citations), Neurology (189 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (179 citations). Hsing‐Ching Kuo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen M. Friel, Andrew M. Gordon, Claudio L. Ferre, Marina B. Brandão, Ya‐Ching Hung, Yannick Bleyenheuft, Jason B. Carmel, Adam Kirton, Ephrem Zewdie and Jeanne Charles. Their work appears in journals such as Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Clinical Neurophysiology, Frontiers in Neuroscience and Research in Developmental Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact