Hope Dodd

7 papers receiving 397 citations

Hope Dodd's Hit Papers

Work-family strategies during COVID-19: Examining gender dynamics among dual-earner couples with young children. 2020 · 244 citations
2440+2+4Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Hope Dodd
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 115
  • Gender Studies 61
  • Social Psychology 116
  • Sociology and Political Science 214
  • Clinical Psychology 69
Replace Stefaan Pleysier with:
Stefaan Pleysier Belgium
Jerome L. Neapolitan United States
Gregg J. Gold United States
Jonathon A. Cooper United States
Gordon Matthew Sayre United States
Mark Cooney United States
Jamie L. Peterson Gloor Switzerland
Dana Harari United States
Elena Zubielevitch New Zealand
Megan Denver United States
Hope Dodd relative to Stefaan Pleysier Belgium Stefaan Pleysier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Stefaan Pleysier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hope Dodd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hope Dodd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hope Dodd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hope Dodd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hope Dodd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hope Dodd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hope Dodd. The network helps show where Hope Dodd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Hope Dodd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hope Dodd Line = papers co-authored together Hope Dodd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Work-family strategies during COVID-19: Examining gender dynamics among dual-earner couples with young children.
Hit paper breakdown →
2020244
2 202189
3 201431
4 202219
5 201911
6
Effects of Small Dams on Cold Water Stream Fish Communities
20069
7 20245
8 20230

About Hope Dodd

Hope Dodd is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Aquatic Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), COVID-19 and Mental Health (1 paper), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (1 paper), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (1 paper), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (1 paper) and Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (115 citations), Gender Studies (61 citations), Social Psychology (116 citations), Sociology and Political Science (214 citations) and Clinical Psychology (69 citations). Hope Dodd has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kristen Michelle Shockley, Eden B. King, Malissa Amy Clark, Tammy D. Allen, Jessica M. Nicklin, Craig P. Paukert, Michael J. Siepker, Elizabeth A. Mahar, Laurie B. Mintz and Daniel B. Hayes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Ecology Of Freshwater Fish and Sexual & Relationship Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact