Holger Döring

753 citations
16 papers · 349 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Holger Döring

15 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Holger Döring
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Political Science and International Relations 295
  • Strategy and Management 97
  • Public Administration 14
  • Communication 28
  • Gender Studies 35
Replace Giacomo Benedetto with:
Giacomo Benedetto United Kingdom
Anna Brigevich United States
Enrico Borghetto Portugal
Klaus Stolz Germany
Luca Pinto Italy
Katrin Praprotnik Austria
Alejandro Ecker Germany
Sandra Léon United Kingdom
Nikoleta Yordanova Germany
Robin E. Best United States
Holger Döring relative to Giacomo Benedetto United Kingdom Giacomo Benedetto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Giacomo Benedetto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Holger Döring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Döring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Döring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Döring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Holger Döring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Döring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Döring. The network helps show where Holger Döring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Holger Döring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Holger Döring Line = papers co-authored together Holger Döring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201960
2 201343
3 200742
4 201537
5 201532
6 201229
7 201529
8 200723
9 202017
10 202114
11 20218
12 20167
13 20194
14 20202
15
Ministerial Careers and 'The Missing Piece': Introducing and operationalising the ministerial careers framework
20122
16
Jean-Claude Juncker’s new European Commission is the most ‘politicised’ in the institution’s history
20140

About Holger Döring

Holger Döring is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Communication, Artificial Intelligence and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (5 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), European and International Law Studies (2 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (295 citations), Strategy and Management (97 citations), Public Administration (14 citations), Communication (28 citations) and Gender Studies (35 citations). Holger Döring has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Philip Manow, Sven Regel, Johan Hellström, Hanna Schwander, Jonathan Bright, Conor Little, Michael Herrmann, Alejandro Ecker, Marc Debus and Arndt Wonka. Their work appears in journals such as West European Politics, European Union Politics, British Journal of Political Science, Politische Vierteljahresschrift and Political Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact