Ho-Chen Lin

436 citations
10 papers · 340 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Barrier Structure and Function Studies 2
    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 1
    • Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications 3

Ho-Chen Lin

10 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Ho-Chen Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Developmental Neuroscience 39
  • Neurology 51
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 81
  • Materials Chemistry 149
  • Biomaterials 39
Replace Uliana De Simone with:
Uliana De Simone Italy
Felix Bulcke Germany
Vijayprakash Manickam India
Eva M. Luther Germany
Seoyoung Park South Korea
Ling Xiong China
Anliang Shao China
Amber Rinderknecht United States
Keyu He China
Ahram Jang South Korea
Ho-Chen Lin relative to Uliana De Simone Italy Uliana De Simone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Uliana De Simone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ho-Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ho-Chen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ho-Chen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ho-Chen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ho-Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ho-Chen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ho-Chen Lin. The network helps show where Ho-Chen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ho-Chen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ho-Chen Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ho-Chen Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2014134
2 201677
3 201742
4 201736
5 201616
6 202113
7 201610
8 20227
9 20233
10 20222

About Ho-Chen Lin

Ho-Chen Lin is a scholar working on Neurology, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Cancer Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (2 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (1 paper), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (1 paper), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper) and Immunotoxicology and immune responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (39 citations), Neurology (51 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (81 citations), Materials Chemistry (149 citations) and Biomaterials (39 citations). Ho-Chen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chun‐Yu Chuang, I‐Lun Hsiao, Yuh-Jeen Huang, Chu‐Fang Wang, I‐Chieh Chen, Chien‐Hou Wu, Wei‐Chun Chou, Yanyan Tan, Kuan-Hsueh Chen and Ming‐Yi Ho. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology in Vitro, iScience, Toxicological Sciences, Emerging Microbes & Infections and Microbiology Spectrum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact