Hiroko Arikawa

645 citations
24 papers · 479 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Hiroko Arikawa

24 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Hiroko Arikawa
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 157
  • Applied Psychology 55
  • Social Psychology 218
  • Clinical Psychology 137
  • Health 50
Replace Rachel Dale with:
Rachel Dale Austria
Katherine Jacobs Bao United States
Pat Sable United States
Tonya M. Shoda United States
Cynthia K. Chandler United States
Laura Dunne United Kingdom
Alan D. Bowd Canada
Bonnie H. Wolkenstein United States
Adelma M. Hills Australia
Laura E. Stayton United States
Hiroko Arikawa relative to Rachel Dale Austria Rachel Dale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Rachel Dale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hiroko Arikawa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hiroko Arikawa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hiroko Arikawa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hiroko Arikawa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hiroko Arikawa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hiroko Arikawa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hiroko Arikawa. The network helps show where Hiroko Arikawa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Hiroko Arikawa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hiroko Arikawa Line = papers co-authored together Hiroko Arikawa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200591
2 200672
3 200858
4 200257
5 200450
6 200335
7 199925
8 200418
9 200718
10 200810
11 20046
12 20055
13 19985
14 20034
15 20004
16 20094
17 20034
18 20074
19 20133
20
THE NATURE AND STRUCTURE OF FEBRILE PSYCHOSIS IN THE SUDAN
19982

About Hiroko Arikawa

Hiroko Arikawa is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (5 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (157 citations), Applied Psychology (55 citations), Social Psychology (218 citations), Clinical Psychology (137 citations) and Health (50 citations). Hiroko Arikawa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Donald I. Templer, Donald Templer, M. Harville, Ahmed M. Abdel‐Khalek, David Lester and Abdel W. Awadalla. Their work appears in journals such as OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, Intelligence, Personality and Individual Differences, The Journal of Psychology and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact