Hinrich Cramer

727 citations
31 papers · 459 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Hinrich Cramer

31 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Hinrich Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 86
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 207
  • Physiology 45
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
  • Developmental Biology 10
Replace Shukuko Yoshida with:
Shukuko Yoshida Japan
Jill A. Stivers United States
Ester Marı́a López Argentina
M. F. Celani Italy
Lisa Bednarz United States
Wanyun Zeng United States
Anes Ju South Korea
Nancy E. Sirett New Zealand
Éva Renner Hungary
Jean‐Claude Martel Canada
Hinrich Cramer relative to Shukuko Yoshida Japan Shukuko Yoshida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Shukuko Yoshida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hinrich Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hinrich Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hinrich Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hinrich Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hinrich Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hinrich Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hinrich Cramer. The network helps show where Hinrich Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hinrich Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hinrich Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Hinrich Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196991
2 197352
3 197142
4 197323
5 198622
6 197522
7 197222
8 197321
9 197017
10 198715
11 199215
12 197413
13 198312
14 198611
15 19759
16 19679
17 19778
18 19877
19 19807
20 19706

About Hinrich Cramer

Hinrich Cramer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Neurology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (86 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (207 citations), Physiology (45 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations) and Developmental Biology (10 citations). Hinrich Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Yasuo Hishikawa, Wolfgang Kuhlo, Toni Lindl, William E. Bunney, Klaus Rißler, FrederickK. Goodwin, Stephen D. Silberstein, Irwin J. Kopin, Ingeborg Hanbauer and David G. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Brain Research, Neuroscience Research, The Lancet and Experimental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact