Hillary Chute

25 papers receiving 584 citations

Hillary Chute's Hit Papers

Disaster Drawn 2016 · 151 citations
1510+3+6Years since publication50100150

Peers

Hillary Chute
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 713
  • Speech and Hearing 346
  • Literature and Literary Theory 314
  • Cultural Studies 57
  • Social Psychology 107
Replace Charles R. Garoian with:
Charles R. Garoian United States
Patricia Waugh United Kingdom
Michael J. Emme Canada
Alice J. Pitt Canada
Evelyn Arizpe United Kingdom
Cara A. Finnegan United States
Morag Styles United Kingdom
André Lepecki United States
Christina MacRae United Kingdom
Amelia Jones United States
Hillary Chute relative to Charles R. Garoian United States Charles R. Garoian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Charles R. Garoian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hillary Chute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hillary Chute's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hillary Chute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hillary Chute more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hillary Chute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hillary Chute. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hillary Chute. The network helps show where Hillary Chute may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Hillary Chute, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hillary Chute Line = papers co-authored together Hillary Chute links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008229
2
Disaster Drawn
Hit paper breakdown →
2016151
3 2006103
4 201698
5 201457
6 200853
7 201446
8 201142
9 201230
10 200623
11 200619
12 200711
13
Why Comics?: From Underground to Everywhere
201711
14 20079
15 20126
16 20185
17 20145
18 20083
19 20113
20 20063

About Hillary Chute

Hillary Chute is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Speech and Hearing and Social Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 915 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Comics and Graphic Narratives (20 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (9 papers), Digital Games and Media (9 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (3 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (3 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (713 citations), Speech and Hearing (346 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (314 citations), Cultural Studies (57 citations) and Social Psychology (107 citations). Hillary Chute has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marianne DeKoven, Patrick Jagoda, Alison Bechdel, David Glover, Fred Botting, Nicholas Daly, John Caughie, Roger Luckhurst, Nicola Humble and Brenda R. Silver. Their work appears in journals such as Modern fiction studies, Critical Inquiry, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, Feminist Studies and Twentieth Century Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact