Herbert Jelinek

19 papers receiving 473 citations

Peers

Herbert Jelinek
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Biophysics 48
  • Ophthalmology 61
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 88
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 91
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 72
Replace Claudio Stamile with:
Claudio Stamile France
Yuchuan Qiao United States
Dmitry D. Postnov Denmark
Jean‐Paul Armspach France
Kaikai Shen Australia
Sharif Amit Kamran United States
Jan Freyberg United States
Alexandra L. Young United Kingdom
Vassili Kovalev Belarus
Herbert Jelinek relative to Claudio Stamile France Claudio Stamile's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Claudio Stamile · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Jelinek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Jelinek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Jelinek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Jelinek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Jelinek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Jelinek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Jelinek. The network helps show where Herbert Jelinek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Herbert Jelinek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Herbert Jelinek Line = papers co-authored together Herbert Jelinek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001157
2 200971
3 200667
4 200934
5 198824
6 200122
7 200121
8 200121
9 202421
10 200718
11 200316
12 20097
13
Is there meaning in fractal analyses
19986
14 20085
15 20003
16 20251
17 20251
18 20081
19
Fractal analyses of pyramidal neurones in macaque visual cortex
19991
20 20250

About Herbert Jelinek

Herbert Jelinek is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers), Fractal and DNA sequence analysis (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers) and Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (48 citations), Ophthalmology (61 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (88 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (91 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (72 citations). Herbert Jelinek has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Arab Emirates and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Eduardo Fernández, Michael J. Cree, Guy N. Elston, Lexin Wang, Ross S. Richards, David Cornforth, Robert A. Rush, Maher Maalouf, Ian A. Hendry and Caryl E. Hill. Their work appears in journals such as Fractals, Scientific Reports, Methods, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice and Redox Report.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact