Henning Pieper

404 citations
18 papers · 310 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Henning Pieper

16 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Henning Pieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 159
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 266
  • Structural Biology 2
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 21
  • Materials Chemistry 46
Replace G. Hillier with:
G. Hillier United States
F. A. Shirland United States
A. Laades Germany
Deepak A. Ramappa United States
D. Iencinella Italy
Masamichi Ohmori Japan
A. Gasparotto Italy
J. Newton United States
S. Peters Germany
Ming-Ju Yang Japan
Henning Pieper relative to G. Hillier United States G. Hillier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G. Hillier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Henning Pieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Henning Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henning Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henning Pieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Henning Pieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henning Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henning Pieper. The network helps show where Henning Pieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Henning Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Henning Pieper Line = papers co-authored together Henning Pieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1981182
2 196232
3 197526
4 198413
5 201613
6 197812
7 197510
8
[A new manometric probe with electrical transmission].
19528
9 19573
10 19803
11 20202
12 20142
13 19741
14 20171
15
Fegelein's Horsemen and Genocidal Warfare: The SS Cavalry Brigade in the Soviet Union
20141
16 20141
17
Die Waffen-SS. Neue Forschungen
20150
18 20140

About Henning Pieper

Henning Pieper is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, History, Materials Chemistry and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (5 papers), German History and Society (4 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (4 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (3 papers), European history and politics (3 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (2 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (159 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (266 citations), Structural Biology (2 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (21 citations) and Materials Chemistry (46 citations). Henning Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include K. Graff, E. Wetterer, Efraim Inbar, Béatrice Heuser, Stephen Blank, David E. Johnson, Rob Johnson, Eyal Zisser and Yitzhak Shichor. Their work appears in journals such as The International History Review, Metal Music Studies, Journal of Electronic Materials, The German Quarterly and German History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact