Helmut Schmidhammer

2.8k citations
146 papers · 2.4k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Helmut Schmidhammer

140 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Helmut Schmidhammer
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Pharmacology 441
  • Physiology 625
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
  • Organic Chemistry 471
Replace Mariana Spetea with:
Mariana Spetea Austria
P. Dostert Italy
Stephen M. Husbands United Kingdom
W. Soudijn Netherlands
Peg Davis United States
Géza Tóth Hungary
Harvey J. Kupferberg United States
F.D. Tattersall United Kingdom
Christina M. Dersch United States
I. van Wijngaarden Netherlands
Helmut Schmidhammer relative to Mariana Spetea Austria Mariana Spetea's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Mariana Spetea · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helmut Schmidhammer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helmut Schmidhammer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helmut Schmidhammer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helmut Schmidhammer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helmut Schmidhammer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helmut Schmidhammer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helmut Schmidhammer. The network helps show where Helmut Schmidhammer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helmut Schmidhammer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helmut Schmidhammer Line = papers co-authored together Helmut Schmidhammer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 146 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198972
2 200372
3 200269
4 200565
5 201765
6 201665
7 201457
8 198456
9 200652
10 199950
11 200846
12 199345
13 199841
14 201240
15 200639
16 200337
17 199037
18 199937
19 201036
20 199035

About Helmut Schmidhammer

Helmut Schmidhammer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry and Physiology, having authored 146 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (75 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (65 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (33 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (30 papers), Plant-based Medicinal Research (24 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (23 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (19 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Pharmacology (441 citations), Physiology (625 citations), Molecular Biology (1.4k citations) and Organic Chemistry (471 citations). Helmut Schmidhammer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Mariana Spetea, Johannes Schütz, Arnold Brossi, Colin F. C. Smith, Aquilino Lantero, Ilona P. Berzetei‐Gurske, Gerhard Wolber, Willy P. Burkard, Elisabeth Greiner and Muhammad Asim. Their work appears in journals such as Helvetica Chimica Acta, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, European Journal of Pharmacology, Molecules and Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact