Helen Wright

31 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Helen Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pharmacology 616
  • Genetics 917
  • Biotechnology 97
  • Microbiology 6
  • Molecular Medicine 36
Replace Arryn R. Craney with:
Arryn R. Craney United States
Satoshi Nakashio Japan
Kaoru Uchida Japan
A. Cox Australia
Deborah A. Ribardo United States
George M. Luedemann United States
Maria Andersson Finland
Eun‐Ik Koh United States
Sanne Westhoff Netherlands
Huichun Tong China
Helen Wright relative to Arryn R. Craney United States Arryn R. Craney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.9×
Arryn R. Craney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Wright. The network helps show where Helen Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Wright Line = papers co-authored together Helen Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983381
2 1982369
3 1977156
4 1978104
5 1985102
6 198374
7 198471
8 198354
9 197953
10 201645
11 197243
12 200836
13 197133
14 197330
15 197625
16 200821
17 202020
18 202419
19 198115
20 200314

About Helen Wright

Helen Wright is a scholar working on Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (14 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Dermatological diseases and infestations (1 paper), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (1 paper) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (616 citations), Genetics (917 citations), Biotechnology (97 citations), Microbiology (6 citations) and Molecular Medicine (36 citations). Helen Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Alan Hopwood, Tobias Kieser, Mervyn J. Bibb, Charles J. Thompson, Stanley N. Cohen, Francisco Malpartida, Derek J. Lydiate, Gilberto Hintermann, E.J.A. Lea and Brian A.M. Rudd. Their work appears in journals such as Microbiology, BMC Medical Education, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact