Helen Wright

2.1k citations
39 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Helen Wright

37 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Helen Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 531
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 764
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 139
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 71
Replace Hirokuni Tagaya with:
Hirokuni Tagaya Japan
Shingo Kitamura Japan
Jennifer C. Kanady United States
Ruth L F Leong Singapore
Yo Miyata Japan
Vadim S. Rotenberg Israel
Scott Coussens Australia
Norifumi Tsuno Japan
Katy Borodkin Israel
Liisa Kuula Finland
Helen Wright relative to Hirokuni Tagaya Japan Hirokuni Tagaya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
Hirokuni Tagaya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Wright. The network helps show where Helen Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Wright Line = papers co-authored together Helen Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011206
2 2011200
3 2012196
4 1993138
5 2009127
6 2005105
7 201484
8 200280
9 198878
10 201363
11 201153
12 199650
13 199050
14 200736
15 201432
16 200826
17 201224
18 200524
19 201023
20 201415

About Helen Wright

Helen Wright is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (17 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (12 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (9 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (4 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (531 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (764 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (139 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (71 citations). Helen Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Leon Lack, Michael Gradisar, Michelle A. Short, Mary A. Carskadon, Ruth Campbell, David J. Kennaway, Hayley Dohnt, Nicole Lovato, Greg Gardner and Edward M. Weaver. Their work appears in journals such as SLEEP, Journal of Sleep Research, Sleep Medicine, Journal of American History and American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact