Helen Cramer
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Homelessness and Social Issues
- Pharmacy top 10%
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 4
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 3
- Health 6
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 6
- Co-authors
- Rachel Johnson (10 shared papers)Gene Feder (12 shared papers)Lesley Wye (4 shared papers)Katrina Turner (3 shared papers)Jane Blazeby (1 shared paper)Jenny Donovan (1 shared paper)David Wainwright (1 shared paper)Ricardo Araya (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Trials (4 papers)BMJ Open (3 papers)Health Expectations (3 papers)BJGP Open (2 papers)Evidence & Policy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Helen Cramer
36 papers receiving 689 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- General Health Professions 197
- Pharmacy 22
- Clinical Psychology 82
- Health 31
- Public Administration 12
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Cramer
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Cramer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Cramer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Cramer. The network helps show where Helen Cramer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 15 |
About Helen Cramer
Helen Cramer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 712 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (197 citations), Pharmacy (22 citations), Clinical Psychology (82 citations), Health (31 citations) and Public Administration (12 citations). Helen Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Johnson, Gene Feder, Lesley Wye, Katrina Turner, Jane Blazeby, Jenny Donovan, David Wainwright, Ricardo Araya, Katie Whale and Sarah Purdy. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, BMJ Open, Health Expectations, BJGP Open and Evidence & Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.