Heather Smith
Impact in
- Clinical Biochemistry top 2%
- Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Papers in
-
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus 3
-
- Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing 3
- Co-authors
- Anette Loeffler (3 shared papers)Jodi A. Lindsay (3 shared papers)D. H. Lloyd (3 shared papers)Dirk U. Pfeiffer (3 shared papers)Kim Stevens (1 shared paper)Anders Dalsgaard (1 shared paper)Amanda Boag (1 shared paper)Julia Sung (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (2 papers)Journal of Hospital Infection (1 paper)Animal Welfare (1 paper)Veterinary Research (1 paper)Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaIreland
In The Last Decade
Heather Smith
5 papers receiving 371 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Clinical Biochemistry 175
- Infectious Diseases 296
- Microbiology 61
- Equine 13
- Molecular Medicine 27
Countries citing papers authored by Heather Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Smith. The network helps show where Heather Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Heather Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 223 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 0 |
About Heather Smith
Heather Smith is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Clinical Biochemistry, Genetics, Small Animals and Molecular Biology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (3 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (1 paper), Rabies epidemiology and control (1 paper), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (1 paper) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (175 citations), Infectious Diseases (296 citations), Microbiology (61 citations), Equine (13 citations) and Molecular Medicine (27 citations). Heather Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Anette Loeffler, Jodi A. Lindsay, D. H. Lloyd, Dirk U. Pfeiffer, Kim Stevens, Anders Dalsgaard, Amanda Boag, Julia Sung, Luca Guardabassi and Ricardo J. Soares Magalhães. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Journal of Hospital Infection, Animal Welfare, Veterinary Research and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.