Heather Rocha
Impact in
-
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
-
- Social Media in Health Education
Papers in
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 3
- Genetics 2
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 2
- Co-authors
- Alanna Kulchak Rahm (5 shared papers)Adam H. Buchanan (6 shared papers)Miranda L. G. Hallquist (5 shared papers)Christa Lese Martin (4 shared papers)Amy C. Sturm (4 shared papers)Juliann M. Savatt (4 shared papers)Marc S. Williams (5 shared papers)H. Lester Kirchner (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Genetics in Medicine (3 papers)Patient Education and Counseling (1 paper)Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (1 paper)Frontiers in Genetics (1 paper)Journal of Genetic Counseling (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Heather Rocha
7 papers receiving 172 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Genetics 105
- Health 9
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 18
- General Health Professions 20
- Health Informatics 1
Countries citing papers authored by Heather Rocha
This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Rocha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Rocha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Rocha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Rocha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Rocha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Rocha. The network helps show where Heather Rocha may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Heather Rocha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 1 |
About Heather Rocha
Heather Rocha is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Surgery, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 7 papers that have together received 178 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Digital Marketing and Social Media (1 paper), Social Media in Health Education (1 paper) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (105 citations), Health (9 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (18 citations), General Health Professions (20 citations) and Health Informatics (1 citation). Heather Rocha has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Adam H. Buchanan, Miranda L. G. Hallquist, Christa Lese Martin, Amy C. Sturm, Juliann M. Savatt, Marc S. Williams, H. Lester Kirchner, Tara Schmidlen and M. Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics in Medicine, Patient Education and Counseling, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Frontiers in Genetics and Journal of Genetic Counseling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.