Heather Deans

20 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Heather Deans
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Hepatology 42
  • Health 35
  • Oncology 98
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 22
  • Gender Studies 25
Replace Wendy Visscher with:
Wendy Visscher United States
Asiye Uğraş Dikmen Türkiye
Gabriele Farina Italy
Kedar Jambhekar United States
Tamas S. Gal United States
Maria Chiara Bassi Italy
Liming Huang United States
Titilola Falasinnu United States
Cynthia Janus United States
Jason A. Freed United States
Heather Deans relative to Wendy Visscher United States Wendy Visscher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Wendy Visscher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Deans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Deans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Deans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Deans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Deans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Deans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Deans. The network helps show where Heather Deans may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Heather Deans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heather Deans Line = papers co-authored together Heather Deans links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201766
2 198957
3 199442
4 200837
5 199836
6 199629
7 198928
8 200919
9 199819
10 198817
11 198816
12
Accuracy of one-stop diagnosis for 1110 patients presenting to a symptomatic breast clinic
199812
13 199311
14 199810
15 19959
16 20087
17 20026
18 19886
19
How Anxiogenic is Recall Following Breast Screening and Does a Family History of Breast Cancer Make a Difference
19956
20 20121

About Heather Deans

Heather Deans is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Genetics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), AI in cancer detection (2 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (42 citations), Health (35 citations), Oncology (98 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (22 citations) and Gender Studies (25 citations). Heather Deans has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Manpal Singh Bhogal, Fiona J. Gilbert, Gillian Needham, Karen A. Duncan, C. Cordiner, F. W. Smith, A. A. DUNK, Dorothy Jordan Lloyd, N. A. G. Mowat and J. A. O. Besson. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Radiology, Clinical Radiology, Breast Cancer Research, Journal of Hepatology and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact